-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor incremental cache to be extensible #37258
Merged
kodiakhq
merged 4 commits into
vercel:canary
from
ijjk:update/refactor-incremental-cache
May 28, 2022
Merged
Refactor incremental cache to be extensible #37258
kodiakhq
merged 4 commits into
vercel:canary
from
ijjk:update/refactor-incremental-cache
May 28, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Stats from current PRDefault Build (Decrease detected ✓)General Overall increase
|
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 21s | 20.9s | -69ms |
buildDurationCached | 8s | 8s | |
nodeModulesSize | 626 MB | 626 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 5.528 | 5.521 | -0.01 |
/ avg req/sec | 452.23 | 452.83 | +0.6 |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 2.226 | 2.282 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1123.21 | 1095.64 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
925.HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42 kB | 42 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 29.2 kB | 29.2 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.54 kB | 1.54 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 72.9 kB | 72.9 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.36 kB | 1.36 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 193 B | 193 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 308 B | 308 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 327 B | 327 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.7 kB | 2.7 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 359 B | 359 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 920 B | 920 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 5.74 kB | 5.74 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 263 B | 263 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.65 kB | 2.65 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 320 B | 320 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 391 B | 391 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 318 B | 318 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 16 kB | 16 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 459 B | 459 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 533 B | 533 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 547 B | 547 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 528 B | 528 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.61 kB | 1.61 kB | ✓ |
Default Build with SWC (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
buildDuration | 23.9s | 24.1s | |
buildDurationCached | 8s | 7.9s | -126ms |
nodeModulesSize | 626 MB | 626 MB |
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
/ failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/ total time (seconds) | 5.443 | 5.481 | |
/ avg req/sec | 459.29 | 456.1 | |
/error-in-render failed reqs | 0 | 0 | ✓ |
/error-in-render total time (seconds) | 2.19 | 2.248 | |
/error-in-render avg req/sec | 1141.8 | 1112.01 |
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
925.HASH.js gzip | 178 B | 178 B | ✓ |
framework-HASH.js gzip | 42.7 kB | 42.7 kB | ✓ |
main-HASH.js gzip | 29.7 kB | 29.7 kB | ✓ |
webpack-HASH.js gzip | 1.54 kB | 1.54 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 74 kB | 74 kB | ✓ |
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
polyfills-HASH.js gzip | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Overall change | 31 kB | 31 kB | ✓ |
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_app-HASH.js gzip | 1.35 kB | 1.35 kB | ✓ |
_error-HASH.js gzip | 179 B | 179 B | ✓ |
amp-HASH.js gzip | 311 B | 311 B | ✓ |
css-HASH.js gzip | 324 B | 324 B | ✓ |
dynamic-HASH.js gzip | 2.9 kB | 2.9 kB | ✓ |
head-HASH.js gzip | 357 B | 357 B | ✓ |
hooks-HASH.js gzip | 920 B | 920 B | ✓ |
image-HASH.js gzip | 5.84 kB | 5.84 kB | ✓ |
index-HASH.js gzip | 261 B | 261 B | ✓ |
link-HASH.js gzip | 2.78 kB | 2.78 kB | ✓ |
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip | 322 B | 322 B | ✓ |
script-HASH.js gzip | 392 B | 392 B | ✓ |
withRouter-HASH.js gzip | 317 B | 317 B | ✓ |
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip | 107 B | 107 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 16.4 kB | 16.4 kB | ✓ |
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
_buildManifest.js gzip | 458 B | 458 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 458 B | 458 B | ✓ |
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary | ijjk/next.js update/refactor-incremental-cache | Change | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html gzip | 532 B | 532 B | ✓ |
link.html gzip | 546 B | 546 B | ✓ |
withRouter.html gzip | 528 B | 528 B | ✓ |
Overall change | 1.61 kB | 1.61 kB | ✓ |
ijjk
requested review from
timneutkens,
shuding,
padmaia and
huozhi
as code owners
May 28, 2022 00:06
shuding
approved these changes
May 28, 2022
Is there any documentation about this feature? |
Experimental features are intentionally not documented as they can change at any time until they are released as stable. |
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2022
Continuation of #37258 this moves the LRU cache to the `file-system-cache` so that any different cache handlers don't need to disable the LRU cache as this may cause inconsistencies with some cache handlers that need to be the source of truth.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This refactors the
incremental-cache
and moves the file-system cache handling to it's own cache handler allowing it to be replaced by a custom cache handler (experimental).Closes: #22619
Bug
fixes #number
contributing.md
Feature
fixes #number
contributing.md
Documentation / Examples
yarn lint